Tuesday, February 21, 2017

NAGALAND IN TURMOIL OVER 33 PER CENT RESERVATION FOR WOMEN IN LOCAL URBAN BODIES

-          Nagaland has been in a state of  chaos and disorder  ever since State Government took a decision  to conduct Local Urban  Bodies (LUBs) elections with 33 per cent reservation for women which  have been due for last 16 years.  The protests are being led by Naga HoHo, Lotha HoHo and   Sumi HoHo – 3 Naga tribal bodies that represent more than 18 Naga tribes. They argue that  the  concept of women's reservations infringes on Naga "traditional rights"   and is against their      customary tribal beliefs and that the Naga society is allowed to follow its own customary rules and laws, as guaranteed   by Article 371A[1] of the Constitution[2].
-          The Naga Mothers’ Association (NMA), the key organization, which led the fight for the 33 per cent reservation in the Local Urban Bodies based on Article 243T[3] inserted via 74th Constitutional Amendment in 1993.  In 2016, the Supreme Court passed an interim order requiring the state government to provide   for women’s reservations in the ULBs, as in other states. Chief Minister T.R. Zeliang’s Government had decided to hold the polls on February 1, 2017 after it received an approval from the cabinet on August 10, 2016 .
-          The traditional Naga practices bar women from inheritance.As per one of the study, a woman from Ao tribe can neither become a member of the traditional tribe/clan/village council nor inherit ancestral land, purportedly owing to her ‘physical weakness’.
-          According to the customary laws of the Chakhesang Nagas, when a married woman is caught in adultery, she must leave her husband’s house with only her clothes she is wearing, and pay a fine depending on the gravity of the situation. Whereas, if a married man brings his lover and creates disharmony in the family, he will have to give his wife half his property acquired during his marriage life.
-          Although tribal customary laws are unwritten and uncodified, these oppressive customary practices have emerged as a result of the patriarchal interpretation of these laws by men.
-          There has not been a single women legislator in the state Assembly since 1963 when Nagaland came into being. The only woman to get to Parliament was Rano Shaiza, niece of the pro-independence leader AZ Phizo, who was elected to the Lok Sabha in 1977. Those women who are standing for the polls are under immense pressure to withdraw owing to threats of excommunication. Women are abstaining from coming out in large numbers in support of the reservations fearing increased chaos and tensions.







[1] .  Relevant extract of Article 371A - Special provision with respect to the State of Nagaland:
(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution,
(a) no Act of Parliament in respect of
(i) religious or social practices of the Nagas,
(ii) Naga customary law and procedure,
(iii) administration of civil and criminal justice involving decisions according to Naga customary law,
(iv) ownership and transfer of land and its resources, shall apply to the State of Nagaland unless the Legislative Assembly of Nagaland by a resolution so decides;
      

[2] .  Those rights, mentioned in Article 371A of the Constitution, which is the core of the demands by agitators, have not been codified or explained further. There is scope for ambiguity and misinterpretation. Article 371A should not be tampered with but it must be seen in the ambit of the entire Constitution. It cannot supersede other rights such as equality of all before the law. Does it mean that one group's rights are greater than those of others? That traditional rights protect the rights of men but not of women? There is another question: do traditional rights surely apply to what are recognisable and accepted as traditional bodies, but not to creatures of the Constitution or a colonial legacy?  Municipal bodies are by no means a traditional system.  They are barely a few decades old (says Sanjoy Hazarika, Director of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative).

[3].  Article 243T - Reservation of seats:
(1)  Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipality and the number of seats so reserved shall bear, as nearly as may be, the same proportion to the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in that Municipality as the population of the Scheduled Castes in the Municipal area or of the Scheduled Tribes in the Municipal area bears to the total population of that area and such seats may be allotted by rotation to different constituencies in a Municipality
(2)   Not less than one third of the total number of seats reserved under clause ( 1 ) shall be reserved for women belonging to the Scheduled Castes or, as the case may be, the Scheduled Tribes
(3)   Not less than one third (including the number of seats reserved for women belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes) of the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in every Municipality shall be reserved for women and such seats may be allotted by rotation to different constituencies in a Municipality
(4)  The offices of Chairpersons in the Municipalities shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes and women in such manner as the Legislature of a State may, by law, provide
(5) The reservation of seats under clauses ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) and the reservation of offices of Chairpersons (other than the reservation for women) under clause ( 4 ) shall cease to have effect on the expiration of the period specified in article 334
(6) Nothing in this Part shall prevent the Legislature of a State from making any provision for reservation of seats in any Municipality or offices of Chairpersons in the Municipalities in favour of backward class of citizens


No comments: