Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Tyranny of Article 35A of the Constitution of India R/W Section 6 of the Constitution of J&K on Women of J&K

(A) Article 35A of the Constitution of India. -  Saving of laws with respect to permanent residents and their rights.— “Notwithstanding anything contained in this Constitution, no existing law in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, and no law hereafter enacted by the Legislature of the State,— (a) defining the classes of persons who are, or shall be, permanent residents of the State of Jammu and Kashmir; or (b) conferring on such permanent residents any special rights and privileges or imposing upon other persons any restrictions as respects— (i) employment under the State Government; ii) acquisition of immovable property in the State; (iii) settlement in the State; or (iv) right to scholarships and such other forms of aid as the State Government may provide, shall be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with or takes away or abridges any rights conferred on the other citizens of India by any provision of this Part.”.
(B) Section 6 of the Constitution of J&K. Permanent residents - (1) Every person who is, or is deemed to be, a citizen of India under the provisions of the Constitution of India shall be a permanent resident of the State, if on the fourteenth day of May, 1954-  (a) he was a State Subject of Class I or of Class II ; or  (b) having lawfully acquired immovable property in the State, he has been ordinarily resident in the State for not less than ten years prior to that date. (2) Any person who, before the fourteenth day of May, 1954, was a State Subject of Class I or of Class II and who having migrated after the first day of March, 1947, to the territory now included in Pakistan, returns to the State under a permit for resettlement in the State or for permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law made by the State Legislature shall on such return be a permanent resident of the State. (3) In this section, the expression "State Subject of Class I or of Class II" shall have the same meaning as in State Notification No. 1-L/84 dated the twentieth April, 1927, read with State Notification No. 13/L dated the twenty-seventh June, 1932.
(C)Vide Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 370 of the Constitution, the President (i.e. Central Government), with the concurrence of the Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, was pleased to order the insertion of a new Article namely 35A  in the Indian Constitution. Thus, it was added through an executive act and the procedure prescribed for amendment of the Constitution of India under Article 368 was not followed/or was not required to be followed in view of Article 370.  However, the manner of induction of said Article and vires/validity of the provisions thereof have been put to a challenge before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and is still pending for adjudication.
(D) The existing legal regime (State Laws, Executive notifications and orders etc) of J&K sets out that if a man is permanent resident of J&K and he marries non-permanent resident woman of the State or marries a woman outside the State, his wife is entitled to Permanent Resident Certificate (PRC) and all the ensuing “privileges”. Children born from the wife will also get the PRC rights in full in J&K. (viz. employment under the State Government,  right to hold, inherit and acquire  immovable property in the State; settlement in the State; right to scholarships and such other forms of aid as the State Government may provide; voting right etc). Conversely, if a woman who is permanent resident of J&K marries a non-permanent resident man of the State or marries a man outside the State, she loses her PRC and privileges it entails. Hence, no question of PRCs to husband and children. No associated benefits to them whatsoever.                                                                    (E) A Full Bench of J&K High Court  in State Of Jammu & Kashmir vs  Dr. Susheela Sawhney  was called upon to decide a question as to  “Whether the daughter of a permanent resident of State of Jammu & Kashmir losses her status as a permanent resident of the state of Jammu & Kashmir on her marriage with a person, who is not a permanent resident of the State of Jammu & Kashmir?”(Note: the loss or absence of status as a permanent resident of the state of Jammu & Kashmir disentitles a person not only in respect of right to hold , inherit and acquire immovable property in the state but also in respect of employment in the state and the right to scholarship and such other forms of aid as the State Government may provide etc etc ). Vide a judgment dt 7 October, 2002, by 2-1 majority, the Bench of the High Court held that “a daughter of a permanent resident marrying a non permanent resident will not lose the status of permanent resident of the state of Jammu and Kashmir”.
(F) Thus, the rights of women married to non-state subjects have been protected by virtue of the interpretation placed by the Hon’ble J&K HC of the relevant laws/orders. But their children have been left unprotected. Children whose mother is a permanent resident but father a non-permanent resident are denied the rights. Children have no right to inherit or own property, vote, get admission to professional colleges and get government jobs in Jammu and Kashmir even though they were born and brought up in the state. Their only fault is that their mother had married a person who is not a permanent resident of Jammu and Kashmir.
(G) It is also noteworthy that in 2004, the state government led by Mufti Mohammad Sayeed had introduced a Bill in the Legislature to take away the rights of women who marry a non-state subject. The Bill, passed within six minutes in the Assembly, was blocked in the Upper House because of a massive public protest. Moreover, the Hon’ble Chief Minister of J&K Mehbooba Mufti had recently remarked that all those who are opposed to Articles 370 and 35A and favor their abrogation are “anti-nationals”. Interestingly, Farooq Abdullah (Prominent politician & Ex CM of J&K) is married to an English woman Molly based in London. Their Son Omar Abdullah (Ex CM) is married to Delhi based Payal Nath and Daughter Sarah is married to Rajasthan based Sachin Pilot (Ex Union Minister).

No comments: